EXHIBITS
The Canals of Providence City: Municipal Water System
Array
(
[0] =>
)
Municipal Water System
The idea of a municipal water system had been discussed throughout the 1930s, but it was not until 1938 that the idea became reality. Some reasons a city might choose to turn the provision of culinary water over to city control included the possibility of government assistance (which Providence did in fact receive), more affordable water rates, and undivided oversight over contamination issues.[113] The main reason for objecting to the change was a fear of higher taxes, especially in a period when people were struggling financially.[114]
Apparently the transition in structural terms was not too intimidating, because the target date set for completion was only six months after soliciting bids for construction.[115] The city would not meet this deadline. The municipal water system was not completed until August 1939, a little less than a year after the vote.[116] Overseeing this project was Mayor Walter Fuhriman, a 43-year-old Providence native, a son of the first president of the Blacksmith Fork Irrigation Company, and a professor at the Utah Agricultural College (Utah State University).[117] He had recently become mayor due to the death of his predecessor, J. Austin Frank, from a heart condition.[118] Fuhriman was well-qualified for the task, and upon its completion he resigned to become an Agricultural Economist for the Federal Bureau of Agricultural Economics.[119]
The “key” to the new city-operated water system was the obtaining of rights to a water source that flowed reliably year-round.[120] While the Blacksmith Fork River was one possibility, the ideal source appeared to be a spring owned by the Spring Creek Water Company.[121] The city obtained water rights to the Upper Blacksmith Fork Canal, controlled by the Providence-Blacksmith Fork Irrigation Company.[122] They then used these rights to bargain with the Spring Creek Water Company for rights to their year-round spring.[123] The city’s goal was to obtain full ownership of the spring, but Spring Creek’s shareholders decided against that, and only provided water rights to the city in exchange for water rights to the Upper Blacksmith Fork Canal.[124] The city and the companies had to work closely with one another to resolve conflicts and negotiate maintenance costs.[125]